Kyocera vs Konica minolta?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • T_foot2
    Technician
    • Nov 2011
    • 22

    #1

    Kyocera vs Konica minolta?

    Anyone work on both the Kyocera and the Konica-Minolta lines? Which do you prefer to work on? is one easier than the other?
  • Max
    Senior Tech

    500+ Posts
    • Oct 2011
    • 544

    #2
    Re: Kyocera vs Konica minolta?

    konica for colour, kyocera for b/w

    Comment

    • JR2ALTA
      Service Manager

      Site Contributor
      1,000+ Posts
      • Feb 2010
      • 2027

      #3
      Re: Kyocera vs Konica minolta?

      I've wanted to make a youtube video of replacing feed rollers side-by-side on a Kyocera and Konica. The Kyo video would end at about 29 seconds, Konica 11 minutes.

      I'm pretty sure I could actually install a Kyocera PM kit quicker than replacing Konica feed rollers.


      Konica has lots of firmware bugs and board failures. When I worked on Kyocera a few years ago this was very very rare.

      Comment

      • Supertech
        Technician

        Site Contributor
        50+ Posts
        • Feb 2005
        • 84

        #4
        Re: Kyocera vs Konica minolta?

        Originally posted by Max
        konica for colour, kyocera for b/w
        I agree with you 100% as far as output quality is concerned but the newest Kyocera color boxes are pretty good (I'm talking about the TASKalfa 3551ci/4551ci/5551ci models, their console models still suck balls)


        Originally posted by JR2ALTA
        I've wanted to make a youtube video of replacing feed rollers side-by-side on a Kyocera and Konica. The Kyo video would end at about 29 seconds, Konica 11 minutes. I'm pretty sure I could actually install a Kyocera PM kit quicker than replacing Konica feed rollers. Konica has lots of firmware bugs and board failures. When I worked on Kyocera a few years ago this was very very rare.
        Kyocera is a much more tech friendly box to work on for almost the entire product line.
        They call me Supertech for a reason

        Comment

        • blackcat4866
          Master Of The Obvious

          Site Contributor
          10,000+ Posts
          • Jul 2007
          • 22914

          #5
          Re: Kyocera vs Konica minolta?

          Originally posted by JR2ALTA
          I've wanted to make a youtube video of replacing feed rollers side-by-side on a Kyocera and Konica. The Kyo video would end at about 29 seconds, Konica 11 minutes.

          I'm pretty sure I could actually install a Kyocera PM kit quicker than replacing Konica feed rollers.


          Konica has lots of firmware bugs and board failures. When I worked on Kyocera a few years ago this was very very rare.
          I entirely agree. Along with the easiest color calibration and great image quality, you get lots of firmware bugs. =^..^=
          If you'd like a serious answer to your request:
          1) demonstrate that you've read the manual
          2) demonstrate that you made some attempt to fix it.
          3) if you're going to ask about jams include the jam code.
          4) if you're going to ask about an error code include the error code.
          5) You are the person onsite. Only you can make observations.

          blackcat: Master Of The Obvious =^..^=

          Comment

          • Copier Addict
            Aging Tech

            Site Contributor
            10,000+ Posts
            • Jul 2013
            • 14325

            #6
            Re: Kyocera vs Konica minolta?

            Originally posted by JR2ALTA
            I've wanted to make a youtube video of replacing feed rollers side-by-side on a Kyocera and Konica. The Kyo video would end at about 29 seconds, Konica 11 minutes.

            I'm pretty sure I could actually install a Kyocera PM kit quicker than replacing Konica feed rollers.


            Konica has lots of firmware bugs and board failures. When I worked on Kyocera a few years ago this was very very rare.
            Yes, you do have to keep up on firmware with KonMin machines, but colour is likely the best in the industry. With the new b/w line being the same box as the colour line it makes b/w better as well. Changing feed rollers may take minutes instead of seconds, but it gives the tech a chance to check for potential issues with the feed assembly.

            Comment

            • EarthKmTech
              Step aside, noob

              1,000+ Posts
              • May 2009
              • 2140

              #7
              Re: Kyocera vs Konica minolta?

              It would be nice if km redesigned their feed units to be more tech friendly and do away with silly one way bearings riding on the shafts and make the rollers gear driven etc.

              Perhaps just rip off the xerox design but make the rubber last more than 5 minutes and you would have a great solution.

              Comment

              • CompyTech
                Super Tech

                500+ Posts
                • Feb 2011
                • 706

                #8
                Re: Kyocera vs Konica minolta?

                On the new e Series they finally made the feed rollers pretty simple to get to. On production, they're still using 90s tech unless you get the air feeders.

                As far as KM vs Kyo, I'd take KM over Kyo any day of the week for most things.. Kyo does has some good design aspects tho, but perhaps I'm biased as I've worked on mostly KM for 6 years now.

                Kyos are usually alot cheaper than KMs there for are competitive when customers are considering purchases..

                Comment

                • Copier Addict
                  Aging Tech

                  Site Contributor
                  10,000+ Posts
                  • Jul 2013
                  • 14325

                  #9
                  Re: Kyocera vs Konica minolta?

                  The simpler they make these machines, the less they need us.

                  Comment

                  • Phrag
                    Trusted Tech

                    250+ Posts
                    • Oct 2012
                    • 417

                    #10
                    Re: Kyocera vs Konica minolta?

                    I work on both. Trained more extensively on KonMin machines than Kyo though.

                    Both have +'s and -'s obviously.

                    The new e series rollers take seconds to replace now. No real need to unscrew the feed unit anymore. Mostly. Kyo obviously had this advantage long ago.

                    The Colour machines in the KonMin range these days are simple to replace drums/dev etc. No need to remove the Image Formation Unit, then toner bottles, then devs and drums. I think you need to take the belt out first, which requires the fuser to be removed. Always hated doing that.

                    I've also been to a couple of those Kyo 'Smart' machines where all the parts are user replaceable. All the parts usually reserved for techs are now clipped out by the user. Drums, Fusers, Transfer belts, transfer roller etc etc. Makes it a good choice for T&M customer well out of the way. Charge the parts, and ship the parts to them if they want to replace them. I guess the only problem there is finding someone intelligent, and confident enough to replace them.

                    Comment

                    • Copier Addict
                      Aging Tech

                      Site Contributor
                      10,000+ Posts
                      • Jul 2013
                      • 14325

                      #11
                      Re: Kyocera vs Konica minolta?

                      Originally posted by Phrag
                      The Colour machines in the KonMin range these days are simple to replace drums/dev etc. No need to remove the Image Formation Unit, then toner bottles, then devs and drums. I think you need to take the belt out first, which requires the fuser to be removed. Always hated doing that.
                      .
                      Changing drums has always been easy on KonMin colour machines, except maybe the CF2002 series.
                      Removing the transfer belt does not require removing the fuser first. And changing the drums does not require removing the transfer belt.

                      Comment

                      • Konicoz
                        Technician

                        50+ Posts
                        • Jun 2013
                        • 62

                        #12
                        Re: Kyocera vs Konica minolta?

                        In my opinion after working with them both for just over 2 years

                        best of Kyocera
                        B&W range
                        Tech friendly (except TA range access to drum area...)
                        Boards and electrical (but some connectors are crazy hard to release)
                        firmware - finding latest and upgrading is so easy hassle free
                        Tech support
                        Price of parts

                        best of Konica Minolta
                        user control panel (except for 4 series slide panel... stupid idea)
                        Colour range
                        Mechanical reliability
                        clean machine
                        ....wow finding it hard to say what's good about them, and believe it or not I am a fan...
                        Hey what ya doing? - just screwing around.

                        Comment

                        • darry1322
                          Senior Tech

                          Site Contributor
                          500+ Posts
                          • Oct 2010
                          • 817

                          #13
                          Re: Kyocera vs Konica minolta?

                          Originally posted by copier addict
                          Changing drums has always been easy on KonMin colour machines, except maybe the CF2002 series.
                          Removing the transfer belt does not require removing the fuser first. And changing the drums does not require removing the transfer belt.

                          I was thinking he meant to say the Kyocera units required belt and fuser removal to remove the drums.

                          Comment

                          • Phrag
                            Trusted Tech

                            250+ Posts
                            • Oct 2012
                            • 417

                            #14
                            Re: Kyocera vs Konica minolta?

                            Originally posted by copier addict
                            Changing drums has always been easy on KonMin colour machines, except maybe the CF2002 series.
                            Removing the transfer belt does not require removing the fuser first. And changing the drums does not require removing the transfer belt.

                            Are you saying you don't have to? The manual directs you to. I always followed that. Didn't want anything to break lol. TaskALFA 3550ci, 4550ci manual indicates that it had to be. *shrugs*

                            Comment

                            • Copier Addict
                              Aging Tech

                              Site Contributor
                              10,000+ Posts
                              • Jul 2013
                              • 14325

                              #15
                              Re: Kyocera vs Konica minolta?

                              Originally posted by Phrag
                              Are you saying you don't have to? The manual directs you to. I always followed that. Didn't want anything to break lol. TaskALFA 3550ci, 4550ci manual indicates that it had to be. *shrugs*
                              If you were talking about Kyocera I apologize. It sounded to me like you were referring to KonMin about having to remove transfer belt before you remove the drums.

                              Comment

                              Working...