Kyocera vs Konica minolta?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Phrag
    Trusted Tech

    250+ Posts
    • Oct 2012
    • 417

    #16
    Re: Kyocera vs Konica minolta?

    My apologies. I didn't really clarify. KonMin machines are easy to replace the drums etc.

    Kyo machines required other bits to be taken out before doing so.

    Comment

    • CompyTech
      Super Tech

      500+ Posts
      • Feb 2011
      • 706

      #17
      Originally posted by Phrag
      My apologies. I didn't really clarify. KonMin machines are easy to replace the drums etc.

      Kyo machines required other bits to be taken out before doing so.
      That's right. Took me an hour to change a magenta IU on a TA3050ci vs km c360(15 mins).

      Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

      Comment

      • minoltaed
        Service Manager
        • Aug 2009
        • 44

        #18
        Re: Kyocera vs Konica minolta?

        Been working on Km for 20 years. We sell both Kyocera and Km. Km all the way, if it was up to me all we would sell is the km products. Kyocera products are cheap and pieces of junk!!!

        Comment

        • DayDreamer

          #19
          Re: Kyocera vs Konica minolta?

          Ive worked and am trained on both manufacturers they both have their ups and downs the kon min e series is much faster to work on than previous models making them much more tech friendly but the kyoceras produce truer color and better detail in fine prints no doubt about it. For durability id go kon min i think the kyo needs a makeover they are very large and pretty poor to look at

          Comment

          Working...